Stratford – Honeybourne – Worcester / Oxford

We working with our partners at Stratford Rail Transport Group (SRTG) to amplify this campaign.

THE VISION

The missing, yet crucial, West Midlands link:

  • Reinstatement of the Stratford – Honeybourne – Worcester / Oxford railway is needed to realise the latent demand for rail travel and to transform journey times:
    Stratford – Oxford in 55 mins
    Stratford – London Paddington time in under 2 hours.
  • The significant new development of Long Marston Airfield Garden Village (LMAGV) is being realised. A rail-link is urgently needed to prevent the zone becoming car dependent.
  • We recognise the role of rail as a regeneration tool that would benefit Stratford town centre’s economy in a post-pandemic era.
  • We’re highlighting the importance of provision of a second route between Birmingham – Oxford via Stratford, in the interests of wider rail network resilience.
  • Re-linking would build on the travel opportunities offered by Worcestershire Parkway as an interchange for journeys from Stratford to the South-West /South Wales.

BACKGROUND

When British Rail closed the Stratford-Cheltenham railway line in 1976, they asked that the option to serve Long Marston from the north be preserved if traffic patterns made it necessary in the future and “that the facility to relay a single line in the Stratford area be retained.”

In 1980, British Rail advised Warwickshire County Council that they had no objections to the construction of Seven meadows Road, “but that provision will be made in the verge of the road for a single track to be laid if ever required.”

The Stratford Local Plan has protected the western side of the trackbed for reinstatement of a single-track railway and the eastern side, for a pedestrian/cycle route since 1992, before the Greenway was ever constructed.

The Stratford-Cheltenham railway line has been protected for reinstatement since 1992, in the Stratford, Wychavon, Cotswold, Tewkesbury and Cheltenham Council Local Plans.

The Stratford Rail Study, Halcrow Fox, 1996, established that it would be physically possible to reinstate a single-track railway along Seven Meadows Road at grade and south of the Greenway car park parallel with the cycleway/footpath. There would be no loss of the Greenway.

Michael Dibb CC BY-SA 2.0

THE ROUTE

Reinstatement of the railway does not involve housing demolition.

The detailed GRIP3 Stratford-Honeybourne rail study by Arup in 2012 established that it would be physically possible to reinstate a single-track railway, parallel with the Greenway cycleway/footpath. There are many examples where a single-track railway co-exists with a cycle route.

The Gloucestershire Rail Investment Strategy, March 2020, identifies the potential future strategic importance of the route in its area.

15 Miles between Cheltenham-Hunting Butts tunnel and Broadway are owned by the Gloucestershire & Warwickshire Steam Railway. The 3 mile Long Marston – Honeybourne section is still operational and owned by Network Rail.

As reinstatement through Cheltenham town centre is unlikely due to trackbed breaches to both the vertical and horizontal alignments, a chord line would be required from Cheltenham Racecourse station to connect with the Network Rail main line near Swindon Lane. This could also act as a feed to a potential strategic park & ride site at Cheltenham Racecourse as well as allowing direct trains from London to Cheltenham Racecourse.

A full briefing document is available here.

The Parliamentary powers to construct the railway and are still in for force and have never been repealed.

Under the Planning Act, 2008, S25, CPO powers could be given to increase the track width if required, i.e. the Grenway could be widened and improved if the rail link is reinstated.

A 2021 SOBC study identifies a number of grade options between Stratford Racecourse and Stratford Station, with Light Rail, Tram Train or heavy rail. Options include heavy rail terminating at Stratford Racecourse, tram-train beyond the Racecourse to Stratford Station and heavy rail throughout.

WHY IS IT NOW TIME FOR REINSTATEMENT?

STRATFORD AND THE CAR 

Public transport journey times to/from Stratford are uncompetitive with the private car. Stratford’s poor public transport connectivity creates a dependence on car-based travel and can lead to inequalities associated with ‘forced car ownership’.  

This also locks in many of the negative external impacts of car travel including congestion, poor air quality etc and will be an impediment to future land-use development.

Stratford has limited public transport connectivity: connections to the south and west of Stratford to Worcestershire and Gloucestershire are very limited. This limits economic interactions between these areas, especially for employment and education, with potentially negative implications for business productivity and the functioning of the respective labour markets.

Rail studies in 2012, 2021 and 2024, confirmed that Stratford only attracts 6% of visitors by rail compared to 13% at comparable centres. Based on 3.5m visitors pa, that is the equivalent of 210,000 visitor trips are not made to Stratford by rail.

The recent SOBC-Refresh study, Stantec, 2024, confirmed that: Stratford suffers from car-based ‘over tourism’ at peak times, which has a range of negative impacts including congestion, the presence of an air quality management area in the town centre and a diminution of the public realm.”

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Long Marston Airfield Garden Village (LMAGV) may potentially grow from 3,500 to 10,000 homes or 25,000 additional people, in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. The Stratford-Long Marston-Honeybourne rail corridor already has a committed population of 71,000, potentially increasing to 85,000.

New government housing targets set following the 2024 General Election heighten the need for good transport connectivity, with both Stratford DC and Wychavon DC required to double their rate of annual housing completions. This scale of construction, if realised, will lead to a significant increase in population and the induced travel demand

LMAGV is particularly significant for Stratford is just one of a chain of major developments in an arc stretching from Worcester to Leamington via Moreton-in-Marsh, Pershore, Evesham and Stratford which will need to be accommodated on the network. 

Fully realising the benefits of these new developments dependent on providing transport connectivity that maximises travel opportunities between areas of high economic concentration including Birmingham, Coventry, Oxford (which also provides interchange with East-West Rail), Worcester, Leamington, Warwick, Gloucester / Cheltenham and Stratford.

LOCAL AUTHORITIES RESOLUTIONS

In a 20 February 2025 Statement of Common Ground, between the South Worcestershire Councils (Malvern Hills District Council, Wychavon District Council and Worcester City Council) and Stratford-on-Avon District Council relating to the South Worcestershire Development Plan review:

“Land in the SWDPR continues to be safeguarded at Honeybourne for the reinstating of a rail link from the Cotswold Line to Stratford-upon-Avon at some future date.”

The Statement of Common Ground between Gloucestershire County Council and the South Worcestershire authorities (Wychavon DC, Worcester City Council and Malvern Hills Council, 10th March 2025 – EXAM 78 – Statement of Common Ground between South Worcestershire LPAs and Gloucestershire County Council published:

“Development of the scale proposed in the SWDPR should safeguard sites and corridors so as not to prejudice sustainable transport network development including but not limited to the following:

  • The North Cotswolds railway line which has stations at Pershore, Evesham and Honeybourne.
  • The former alignment of the Stratford to Cheltenham railway line, including the former Chord Lines at Honeybourne Junction.”
CC0 1.0

SUSTAINABLE ROAD ALTERNATIVES – THE NUMBERS

The Stratford Core Strategy Inspector’s Report, 2016, considered that reinstatement of the southbound rail link would: “provide a long-term solution to the town’s traffic congestion. There can be no question that the service would provide a sustainable alternative to the use of the private car for many residents and visitors.”

The landmark DfT, Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (SACTRA) report Dec 1994, concluded that after 40 years of building roads to meet demand, it was a failed policy.

When a new road is built, new traffic will quickly fill it up. Some will be diverted from other roads, but many people will make trips they would otherwise not make and will travel longer distances just because of the presence of the new road.

This well-known and long-established effect is known as ‘induced traffic’ which means that the predicted congestion benefits of a new road are very quickly eroded. Traffic on bypassed roads often also rises faster than expected all of which means the promised congestion benefits of a new road can evaporate very quickly.

Road traffic accounts for 72% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transport (73% of passenger-kilometres), aviation accounts for 14% (8% of passenger-kilometres), and rail accounts for less than 1% (6% of passenger-kilometres).

Road transport accounts for 80% of Nitrogen Dioxide emissions and rail just 1.6%. NO2 emissions account for 29,000 premature UK deaths pa.
(*European Environment Agency (2019), ‘Share of transport greenhouse gas emissions’, data visualization.)

The Government has a 2050 target to reduce emissions by 80%. Poor air quality is a major influence on public health, causing problems for those with respiratory illnesses and cardio-respiratory conditions.

Stratford Area car ownership is high compared to county-wide and national levels, which itself translates into high car dependency for travel to work (71% compared to 59% national average). (Stratford Area Transport Strategy 2018).

The ‘Transport for New Homes,’ report on Garden Villages, 2020. The BBC gave it national coverage with the headline, “Garden villages locking-in car dependency”.

Case Study: Long Marston Garden Village

Long Marston is a proposed 3,500 home Garden Village within the Stratford-upon-Avon District of Warwickshire. It is typical of Garden Villages in that it is far from major population and employment centres. Located on a former airfield, this Garden Village will be particularly remote and without a sustainable scale will not support amenities, jobs or public transport. It is seven miles from the nearest railway station. Residents will have no option other than the car to see friends, get to work or buy a pint of milk. Visions of ‘express bus connections’ are without funding. There are also unfunded aspirations for new safe walking and cycling routes from the development, but even if they were provided there is little other than open space nearby. This is a good example of a new development in the wrong place.”

Stratford-on-Avon District – The last 10 years has seen a 15.2% rise in cars + an additional 10,732 cars since 2001. Almost 50% of households in Stratford District had 2+ more cars. Driving to work by car, the most common form of commuting with 67.8%* or 41,227 of the working population aged 16+. This is higher than the national average of 57.5% (Warwickshire Observatory 2011).

HOW TO ADD YOUR VOICE

Write in support of reopening to your local councillors and MP:

members.parliament.uk/members/commons
or www.writetothem.com

It’s powerful to write to your MP or councillor in your own words, telling your representative about your own beliefs and experiences and how they relate to this area. See below.

Join BRTA as a member to support this and other reopening campaigns

Volunteer with BRTA if you share our vision and want to help bring it about. 

Could you help push this campaign forward?

Donate to BRTA to help us advocate for a rail link fit for the 21st century!

Think about the following questions when composing your letter to MPs / councillors:

  • What journeys do you make? Work? Leisure? Appointments / visits?
    How could this link improve the journeys you make?
  • Do you actively choose road over rail or bus? Why?
  • Do you consider where you live to be well served by public transport?
  • Do you have experience of new areas of housing and public transport?
  • What are your experiences of the road journeys you make in the region?
  • Have you made employment, school or relocation decisions based on journey times or access to public transport? Or on the lack of access to public transport?
  • What are your thoughts on the environmental impact of your journeys?
  • Do you have accessibility needs that affect journey decisions you make?
  • What do you think about air pollution in your area?
  • What are the most important transport related issues to you? Why? Journey times? Road congestion reduction? Pollution reduction? Accessibility? Taking freight off the roads in your area? A better connected region?
  • What should be done next to make this happen?

    Our tips:
  • Even if your MP is not in this region, your letter provides them with an opportunity to learn about the issue and take action themselves.
  • Aim for your letter to be no longer than one and a half sides of A4.
  • Engage. Get your representative’s attention with a dramatic fact or short statement.
  • State the problem. Present the causes of the problem you just introduced. How widespread or serious is the problem?
  • Inform them about the solutions that reopening would bring.
  • Call to Action. Let them know what you want them to do about it.
  • Ask for a response.